Documents

OOG-0004_7.03.17_AO OMA Complaint resolving Whether the DCPCSB may rely on Robert’s Rule of Order to revise at its meeting a final agenda to consider items which require public notice, public presence and a period of public comment.

Whether the DCPCSB may rely on Robert’s Rule of Order to revise at its meeting a final agenda to consider items which require public notice, public presence and a period of public comment. 

OOG-0003_6.21.17_AO Major Crash Task Force OMA

BOARD OF ETHICS AND GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY

OOG-0001_3.20.17 (Revised 6.7.17*)_OMA AO (Makenta) Complaint Resolving Whether the BZA Failed to Properly Notice a Public Hearing and Meet in an Improper Closed Session During its December 14, 2016 Hearing Regarding Case No. 19387.

OMA Complaint Resolving Whether the BZA  Failed to Properly Notice a Public Hearing and Meet in an Improper Closed Session During its December 14, 2016 Hearing Regarding Case No.

OOG-0004_5.13.17_AO Whether a FOIA request that names a sender of email and the D.C. government agency of the recipients constitutes a reasonable description of public records sought under FOIA.

Whether a FOIA request that names a sender of email and the D.C. government agency of the recipients constitutes a reasonable description of public records sought under FOIA.

2.27.17 Director Hughes Testimony Fiscal Year 2018 Budget

  • Posted by: wkittab
  • 2017 05, 01
  • Testimony
  Council of the District of Columbia COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY & PUBLIC SAFETY

OOG-0001_3.31.17_FOIA AO Whether an agency may require that the public submit a FOIA request through District’s FOIA Portal; and, does FOIA requires a public body to provide responsive records to the requester using an encrypted email.

  • Posted by: johnnie-barton
  • 2017 04, 24
Whether an agency may require that the public submit a FOIA request through District’s FOIA Portal; and, does FOIA requires a public body to provide responsive records to the requester using an enc

M Segraves OOG FOIA (#OOG-0001_4.12.17_FOIA AO)

"The foregoing non-binding opinion is issued by the OOG pursuant to section 503(c) of the District of Columbia Administrative Procedure Act, effective March 31, 2011 (D.C.

OOG-0002_ 4.3.17 Advisory Opinion regarding whether the Victim Assistance Network and Reentry Action Network; the Sexual Assault Response Team (SART); the High Risk Domestic Violence Team; and the Domestic Violence Fatality Review Board are public bodies.

   

2.23.17 Director Hughes Testimony_Performance Oversight Hearing

  • Posted by: traci.hughes
  • 2017 02, 24
  • Testimony
Council of the District of Columbia COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY & PUBLIC SAFETY 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20004

OOG-001_2.6.17 Advisory Opinion regarding whether the DBH Ombudsman Advisory Council is subject to the Open Meetings Act.

Pages