OMA Advisory Opinions

OOG-0001_3.20.17 (Revised 6.7.17*)_OMA AO (Makenta) Complaint Resolving Whether the BZA Failed to Properly Notice a Public Hearing and Meet in an Improper Closed Session During its December 14, 2016 Hearing Regarding Case No. 19387.

  • Posted by johnnie-barton
  • Wed 06, 2017
  • 0 comments
OMA Complaint Resolving Whether the BZA  Failed to Properly Notice a Public Hearing and Meet in an Improper Closed Session During its December 14, 2016 Hearing Regarding Case No.

OOG-0002_ 4.3.17 Advisory Opinion regarding whether the Victim Assistance Network and Reentry Action Network; the Sexual Assault Response Team (SART); the High Risk Domestic Violence Team; and the Domestic Violence Fatality Review Board are public bodies.

  • Posted by traci.hughes
  • Tue 04, 2017
  • 0 comments
   

OOG-001_2.6.17 Advisory Opinion regarding whether the DBH Ombudsman Advisory Council is subject to the Open Meetings Act.

  • Posted by traci.hughes
  • Thu 02, 2017
  • 0 comments

OOG-0007 - OMA Complaint Resolving Whether the Cross-Sector Collaboration Task Force Failed to Timely Include On Its Agenda Conference Call Call-In Numbers for the Public to Attend Electronic Meetings

  • Posted by wkittab
  • Thu 12, 2016
  • 0 comments

Commission on African Affairs (COAA) OOG-006 12.12.16

  • Posted by johnnie-barton
  • Tue 12, 2016
  • 0 comments

Director Hughes' Advice that CJCC is Not Subject to the OMA

  • Posted by
  • Wed 09, 2016
  • 0 comments
E-mail advice was rendered by Director Traci Hughes, on September 13, 2016, concerning whether the Criminal Justice Coordinating Council is subject to the Open Meetings Act.

OOG-004_9 7 16 _AO_(1) Whether scheduling of meetings by a quorum of members of the COST by telephone conference would constitute a meeting; (2) Whether strict compliance with the OMA’s “Open Meeting” requirements by the COST would compromise the identity

  • Posted by johnnie-barton
  • Fri 09, 2016
  • 0 comments
(1) Whether scheduling of meetings by a quorum of members of the COST by telephone conference would constitute a meeting; (2) Whether strict compliance with the OMA’s “Open Meeting” requirements by

7.21.16 State Superintendent of Education Uniform Per Pupil Student Funding Formula Working Group Final Opinion

  • Posted by traci.hughes
  • Thu 07, 2016
  • 0 comments

7.15.16 State Superintendent of Education Uniform Per Pupil Student Funding Formula Working Group Opinion and Demand

  • Posted by wkittab
  • Mon 07, 2016
  • 0 comments

4.18.16 OMA Complaint Resolving Whether the DC Housing Authority Board Violated the OMA by Failing to Notice Pre-Board Meetings; Regular Monthly Meetings; Improper Closed Sessions

  • Posted by wkittab
  • Mon 04, 2016
  • 0 comments
  April 18, 2016

Pages